>>4249540you can make a 1000 more threads about scientific data and numbers backing your claims that bigger sensor sized arent better
but at the end of the day, no amount of scientific data or numbers will ever make mft pictures look better than apsc, or apsc better than full frame, or full frame better than medium format or medium format better than large format...
thats just the truth... at the end of the day, the only question that matters, that you should be asking yourself, is; ''DOES IT MAKE MY IMAGES LOOK BETTER?!"
thats what matters the most... its not sharpness, its not megapickles, its not frames per second, its not eye autofocus, its none of that useless, marketing bullshit... its light, its about light and always was. thats why sensor size and lens performance are the two most important things on your ''light gathering device'' that turns light into digital or physical images.
if it doesnt make your images look better = its useless and a marketing trick. period.
larger sensor = always a better sensor. no exceptions.
letting more light in without too much filtering = always a better lens. no exceptions.
deal with reality or keep yapping and making forum threads like a little bitch that you are. its your choice, i dont care...
im just letting you know that your opinion doesnt matter and that nobody cares but you. your life, your time, your choice. accept reality or continue being a little bitch...
thoughts?
also, a little pop quiz; which sensor size was used to take pic related?
