>want to use legendary canon EF 50mm f1.2>RP: sorry no IBIS>EF-RF adapter makes up the DSLR size difference>literally nothing gained over using a DSLR>actually lost more than was gained (worse battery life)thanks canon shills.
>put EF-FE adapter on sony A7 II>can actually use the lens with stabilization but ISO 12800 is slightly worse at 100% zoom at 72ppi which sees 0 use in the real world>actually gained something somewhat>suddenly get suspicious because I know things people say on 4chan are usually wrong if I am not the one who said them>look at photostophotons, the cameras have roughly the same SNR at ISO 12800 and the A7 II leads overall>https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%20RP,Sony%20ILCE-7M2>try the same raws dpreview used>so it's actually a raw, not a jpeg generated by a lightroom preset>use another program>it is impossible to tell the cameras apart by noise performance. only the colors are slightly different.>canon shill, on top of lying and saying you dont need IBIS because most lenses have IS, also lied about the RP doing better at ISO 12800, when it was actually a failing of lightroom's support for earliy .arw filesIf you have to lie to make your case, then your case is not valid.
Of course his next move will be to say you dont need non-IS lenses, and link some test charts, talking about sharpness, because he's a hylic and only understand photographing test charts so things like the look of a lens are totally beyond him.
If you can't mix art and science (usually to realize science doesn't strictly control art, but that all good science is also art), you simply don't belong in either field. You have no soul and no intellect. Not a human - hyic.
If you think you still have any place in this argument, tell me which is the canon RP and which is the Sony A7 II. Left/right. Go. Single answer question. No other responses will be accepted.
