>>4271141This is almost worse than your first photo, lol.
It's so stupid to care about dog hairs that will be easily removed when I'm printing my pictures over the content of the images. I scan for content. Like a digital contact sheet. You're basically gearfagging in disguise.
Im not afraid to post my mistakes. Maybe someone learned something from it. I did, and there was a decent discussion and troubleshooting effort around it.
I never said anything about them being my best photos or anything like that. Simply film, camera, and my thoughts on what went wrong.
Notice the difference with an image I really like
>>4269615