>>4239640hey, no problem
I would recommend you find local labs
There you'll probably find a wider variety of films to buy and test to see what you like, and they'll almost certainly offer you a better service, even if a bit pricier
I started shooting film around 2016 and almost gave up on it because I paid a lot to get shitty development and scanning services
>>4239394>PicrelKodak Double-X shot on medium format camera with adapters at ISO 250
These other two shot were also on Double-X at 400
>>4237815>>4238026