>>4301477I'm not asking people to post images in every single reply to the thread, of course
But there's a difference between posting those 7 photos or at least a few of them and posting fucking nothing
I did post an image with every reply because if want to see more photos I believe I should post more photos instead of pointlessly complaining and to encourage other people to post more, to offer criticism etc.
In sum: for us to talk about actual photography instead of just gear and shit
>>4301478Thanks, anon
I've seen you post this one before (I'm not complaining, I remember it because it was memorable indeed)
And I love how you didn't invert the image and the numbers are mirrored
>>4301495First of all, I was not saying that we WILL have a monopoly
I was saying that cheering because Superia got discontinued is moronic as fuck, and that in a hypothetical scenario with Fuji discontinuing their colour films there would be a monopoly for Kodak in the colour film segment
Which is absolutely true in this scenario. Prove me wrong if you think so.
I'm not saying this scenario *will* happen, I'm saying cheering for discontinuations is stupid
I'm not a doomer
Also look up the definition of monopoly, it's not "when a company owns 100% of the market", it's more along the lines of when one company owns an expressive majority of said market and basically controls it
Anyway, I'll not entertain this discussion even further because what I've said before is clearly written and I'm not defending what you say I'm defending, I'm not a doomer
Refer to the beginning of the discussion for futher clarification
