>>2719351This is good purely because you were in an airplane, and the light was good. It's very poorly processed (visible banding, wtf) and the composition is only so-so
>>2719435thats a circle not a triangle, and again the processing is atrocious
>>2719436why did you post this
>>2719440wasted opportunity, like the first but much worse. You were in a good place, and had a good shot, but you fucked it.
>>2719454I'm beginning to get bored of babby's first plane trip now, have you landed yet?
>>2719455hamfisted composition. tried to do something cliche, but did it poorly. that's a negative score.
You couldn't even get lines in your corners, or at least keep them spaced evenly?
>>2719467The most interesting thing about this photo is photos taken by another person.
Total trash.
>>271946914 stops underexposed.
>>2719470>those hipsMATT GRANGER?
>>2719471Failed at a geometry shot again. Not centered again. Bad directional lighting that skews level horizontal lines. Delete in camera.