>>4183381>now don't accuse that nophoto of being me ever again.To be fair and square, you brought that upon yourself by using my name. Now some schizo believes I shoot a mirrorlesscuck Sony and just larp as a Canon user. My decision to shoot Canon is purely rational, it has the best set of pros and cons imaginable for MY use case. It offers all the features I need and I dearly pay the price in image quality against something with a better sensor from literally any other brand and in terms of usability. Nikon for example has some really cool in-camera NEF editing features. Mostly gimmicks, but enjoyable to use nevertheless. For some people like my bird-shooting dentist uncle they work wonders. He doesn't bother editing RAW in the computer at all, in fact I think he edits the JPEGs instead of NEFs.
>premade framesJust use two sheets of custom-cut glass and you get a neat borderless experience. Some galleries use that.
>I had the original K1 without the shadow pushing problems and don't care about astro. You're thinking of that kiwi cunt. If you're going to be a schizo at least be a correct one.My bad, I wouldn't say the Mark II has shadow pushing problems though. Sure you get a magenta shift but pretty much every camera does.
>EVF/OVF does not matter unless it is a borderline useless OVF like a rangefinder (only excusable on cheap fixed lens cameras)I'd rather take a proper rangefinder than an EVF to be honest, and they're far from useless. The real problem is that you don't see through the lens. For focusing and framing you're golden unless it's an ultrawide. There's always the accesory finders as an alternative, be them sports or tele. Pic related. It's a bit of a tedious endeavor where you focus with the coupled rangefinder and then compose with those but beats having nothing.
>stupid hybrid EVF/sears camera tier viewfinder on the larp fujislmao can't dispute that one. So you were the one who coined that meme, I must admit I'm a fan.
