>>2582358It puzzles me why you think the fish guts are interesting enough for two shots and your header, but it's more than that. At some point, I think your post processing took a downturn. Maybe you're doing more now and need to dial it back?
>>2582365Some of these shots are surprisingly crap, at least to my somewhat ignorant eyes -- like I cannot see the point of including the runway shots.
>>2582376If you're going to do geometric and architectural shots, make sure to correct distortion and perspective.
>>2582399I don't care for your post all that much. I'm also not much of a fan of your aesthetics in general, but that's more a personal thing.
>>2582416I'd say another problem with curation. A lot of strong shots, but some snaps mixed in.
>>2582464I feel you're on the verge of finding your footing. I'm interested to see what follows.
>>2582466Batman. Is. Crooked. Besides that I think your most interesting stuff are your textural shots.
>>2582467I'm interested to see more. I'm turned off by the frequency of hipster processing, but there are germs of things I like here.
>>2582469You use shallow DoF when it's pointless. A little too saturated or strange in your color stuff.
>>2582471...curate, curate, curate. Learning what pictures to keep versus which to cull is key.
>>2582620The later ones with more vegetation are too busy to me. Maybe some dodging and burning to help lead the eye a little?
>>2582636Your compositions are almost generally competent. Need to pay more attention to the details like straightening though.
>>2582637I really like your stuff, but I feel like you're a little lazy with your post or are trying too hard to get the exact same feel from each image. I think there's room in your chosen style to give different images different feelings while still having a unified style.
>>2582646Pay more attention to composition and light/camera settings to give more subject separation -- especially in the later shots. (continued)
