>>3295846>I don't upload good photos to the internet for free (even resized), namely because this website is rife with faggots who love to reverse image search (can you really blame anyone for not wanting their name or business known on 4chan?)Right. I truly believe that anyone who would take shots as bad as these with these laughable camera settings (and also post them online) is a working professional. Really, I do believe you.
>Actually the wildlife photography scene is full of people who encourage people to stay a healthy distance300 feet is much too far, and it helped to net you a snapshot (along with no thought going toward composition, timing, or camera settings)
>I shot that moose and calf handheld at 560, next to plenty of people shooting at 800Like I said, you're a casual tourist in a group of casual tourists, and it shows.
>I decided to stop and shoot quickly a few shots of the moose in shitty lighting, handheldAt f/8, which no professional would do, with a trash lens that no professional would use.
>I don't care for your critiques because you're critiquing images I don't care aboutIf you don't care, why are you being so defensive about them?
>Not every shot is a winner, senpaiAnd you don't post the losers online, kohai. I'm glad you're accepting your role as student.
>Professionals unlikely post their best work on 4chan, eitherProfessionals don't post their worst work anywhere. It's obvious that you aren't a professional no matter how hard you posture based on your photos, attitude, and camera settings.
>I don't get your point- you're saying I should have re-posted it?I'm saying you should have posted only that one.
>>3295694>pretty god damn special>Pretty lucky dayYou sure sound proud to me, and there's nothing wrong with that if you're an amateur, but you are an amateur pretending to be a professional, and it's blatantly obvious.
