>>3379490>Because we're talking magnification.That all depends on which magnification we're talking about. The reproduction ratio is between the subject and the sensor, basically meaningless unless you want to calculate the size of said subject. The other is in relation to the subject and the final resulting image, where sensor size is meaningless.
A photo taken at 1:4 on a full frame body will look similar to one taken at 1:6.4 taken on an APS-C body, the subject of the photo will appear to be the same size. They both have a 1:4 full frame equivalent reproduction ratio, that's what's actually important.
>Could used pixels or something else to tell correctly what you're trying to say.
Huh? How exactly would you propose I did that? And how would that be any clearer?
>So you're saying you get 1:9.7 with clip on? That looked a little low to me, seeing that link with a guy saying lx100 does 0,8:1 with clip on. I assumed it's naked and you don't know what you getIt seems that some of the confusion you're having is that you're not reading my posts clearly. 1:9.7 is without the close up lens, 1:8.6 is with it. What the other guy gets is irrelevant, he's using a different close up lens and has a different sized sensor.
