>>3509837it's okay, I guess you could choose between nature or city photos, but it doesn't matter
>>3509866great quality,overall very nice to look
>>3509882Reroo a minimalist, you know what I think about it
>>3509923pretty simple, interesting gallery
>>3509995very good and aesthetic shots,no snapshits
>>3510052the photo of the orange leafs could easily be a phone or computer wallpaper,also the one with the sky is pretty dope
>>3510075nice colors and good compositions, good style and similar pictures
>>3510092not a big fan of film photography,sorry, they're good I guess
>>3510170nice niche, modern looking stuff and bright colors,just work toward your vision and do your best even if not everybody likes it,perhaps try (or not obvs.) applying a little bit of minimalism to it? like more simple compositions but with the same style
>>3510195nice,simple and wholesome pictures,idk how else to describe it , just what I see
>>3510209wow, great
>>3510566pretty good, but the church one and the sepia looking one are great and stand out
>>3510710cool, it looks pretty cool idk not so interesting, what else to say,maybe stick to a 16:9 format? or not
>>3510837nice format and editing, I like it
>>3510838nice style and similar aesthetic to them which makes it interesting
>>3511197they looked a little bit too much cropped or too much zoomed in, idk what else, it doesn't have a theme or a general feel to them,try editing them with a similar style maybe? obvs do you man
>>3511312not bad,idk I like it
>>3511360pretty cool
idk guys I need a better camera and I've been looking at Sigma because it has a nice bigger and different sensor (foveon) which may capture better colors than a APS-C sensor, I need good low light performance too and maybe the bigger the sensor the better and I should save up, yeah so this is my thing ,low light floral photography, the photos are dark and some say they're underexposed but anything else just ruins the idea (1/2)
