>>3849573Hey there, i bought a GFX 50R a month and some weeks back, no regrets!
I also have an X-H1 and a new x100f, i don't really need any of them, mainly because I don't do paid work (don't know how), there's a TON of lenses you can adapt to it, pretty much every SLR lens and DSLR lenses fit it, you can buy a speedbooster and make it a proper 6x4.5 medium format digital camera with Hasselblad V lenses (the speedbooster gives it a 0.5x crop factor).
I personally have three Minolta lenses that cover the whole sensor and the native 50mm f3.5. Native glass is stupid sharp and the amount of crop you can do is short of ridiculous, that makes me happy (:
The amount of detail you can recover from the most blown highlights is pure magic, you can shoot straight to the sun and still recover shadows and lower highlights.
How the camera body looks was also a factor to me, i like the rangefinder look and the 50S looks hideous.
The camera colors are also pretty nice, be it with or without a recipe, shooting Provia in it feels nice, colors pop, detail pop (when your lens is sharp enough), i regret not getting it sooner. If you can afford it, go for it, you won't regret it.
>>3849579The x-t4 is a better camera starting from the video aspect and that it's not slow while taking pictures, Raws don't weight 100mb (50 compressed), buffer is bigger and smaller, IBIS, cheaper lenses, I'd still rather shoot with the GFX, the difference in detail is stupid, and when you get a good shot on the GFX, it shows.
To me, it is the ultimate stills system, it's absolute horse shit for run&gun or video and you would be a dumbass for buying the 50R/S for that.
