no/p/hoto rating
>>3913846Bit of haze. Push contrast/clarity in post. Decent cloud shot which is saying "not bad but fucking boring".
>>3913837Kinda cool.
>>3913836Agree with the other comment about weird sharpening/jittery bokeh. Also its a bit cliche: central vanishing point with lots of bokeh might look nice for about 3 sec but is a forgettable photo.
>>3913575I'd push the shadows a touch more but not bad.
>>3913427I wanna dislike it but its pretty cool. Is this a film sim or actual film (the highlights and grainsay film but I'm retarded at telling the difference)
>>3913420Nice but plz rotate right slightly.
>>3913378Do better. Get closer? the composition feels unbalanced and kinda jumbled.
>>3913281lol. white border. 4MB. oversized. crushed blacks. (fake) film look. And somehow I don't hate it. Not great but not dislking it as much as I thought I would based on thumbnail.
>>3913154Nice tho saturation seems borderline too much. Still works on my monitor though.
>>3912870Jeez the bokeh on that lens is pretty distracting for some reason.
>>3912855>>3912850Surprisingly good for an animal snapshit.
>>3912815Decent concept but photo is sorta meh. Try more out.
>>3912564Nice! Slightly OoF but still a cool shot.
>>3912162A perfect example of a boring as fuck photo that still looks decent. tilt right on
>>3912163>>3912102Nice timing. Good tones but heavy grain tho. Is that film?
>>3912054Highlights are super blown but given the contrast and scene you might need to return later. The composition as a scenery shot is kinda cool but for an action shot the subject (i.e you) feels too small. Printed at 8 feet across it might come off better but maybe crop? Get closer and use a wide? Not a bad idea though.
>>3911852>>3911853Meme-y but I think it turned out great! Nice photo under tricky exposure, numerous points of visual interest. Good effort I'd say.
