>>3991154>>3991370>>3991449>>3991154>>3991370>>3991449>That's an autoguider cameraNo, it's a planet/moon camera.
>Basically your camera is an autoguider camera, it is not supposed to resolve detailNo, it's a planet/moon camera, designed for high magnification and high fps.
>That is noise, you get it on long exposures and high gainNo, that is a dark frame to show bias on the CCD. If you encounter this kind of noise in your image while capturing or previewing, you can play around with the histogram tool to get a clearer image. The bias will still be captured, which is why we subtract bias frames when stacking.
Anyway, i figured out some stuff, so if anyone had the same problems as me, maybe this will help.
You can do deepsky with a 200$ planet camera. It obviously won't be as good as a professional 2000$ deepsky cameras, but for anyone starting out in the hobby i'd say it's more than enough, and if you end up getting a deepsky camera you can use it for autoguiding, and it's still your best bet for planet or moon imageing. To fix the narrow field of view planet cameras have due to their small CCD chip, you can use a 0.5 reduicer, which doubles your field of view.
What's most important is that you get a motor and a polarscope, without them, the best you can do is 2s exposure, whereas with a motor and decent polar alignement you can do around 2 min with no problem.
Pic related is just 14 frames of 1 min exposure, my first attempt since i got my motor two days ago.
Good luck, and have fun everybody.
