>>4024694>what about it in particular? not big on masking?one of my favorite things in photography was editing street photography. It's close to "editing" as in cinema; it was a creative process and it was amazing fun.
I never cared about quality in street photography, it was the story.
I started bird photography only recently and I'm obsessed with IQ and pixel peeping now. Is it too sharp? is it blurry? do whites pop enough?
the worst part, you can't easily decide too sharp/blurry type of stuff and your eyes can't "see" shit after 5 minutes of editing.
a lot of times I come back from a long break and go `holy shit that's ken rockwell level saturated`.
I'm also generally editing at night so my brightness and color is generally off.
>>4024678for example, having another look this; now I feel whites are way over bright and rock is a little too blurry etc. etc.
I might be a happier man if I edit birds in 5 days or something, like have a brief look at it for 20 seconds a day and only post somewhere after 5th day.
