>>4067378>read the postI did, i didn't see no citation.
>you only see up to 720p in the darkHow are you getting 720p from a 576MP "camera"
https://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.htmlDo you have a citation, as you can see, i do.
>the refresh rate of your eye is more like 1/24Fine, show me how much noise you get with a 1/24 shutter speed whilst giving the same brightness as human vision ;)
>a modern camera can produce noise free video in very low lightOh, where did all that shot noise go to all of a sudden, lmao
>shot noise having multiple definitions when describing electronics and optics, and me arbitrarily choosing just one isn't a notionyes it is bud
>but quantum mechanicshold up bud, you haven't even gotten over the basic literacy hurdle yet, might want to wind that back a bit ;)
>low contrast doesn't affect acuityAre you sure that's a hill you want to die on? Just think about it for 5 seconds, think what MTF is.
>without light our eyes don't work at allwrong, 50% of people can "see" a hand waving in front of their face in absolute darkness
https://guardianlv.com/2013/11/50-percent-of-people-can-see-hands-in-pitch-black-confirms-spelunker-illusion/>if you use a larger sensor, then the proportion of signal to shot noise changesIf I take a cup of orange squash, and calculate the ratio of water and squash in it, will my results change if I take a bigger glass?
Why do you think the ratio of shot noise will change if you use a larger surface area?
10/10 for biting at all my bait though, i wish fish were as keen as you.
I'm just waiting for you to realise that electronic shot noise run through a gain amplifier means that the noise becomes exponentially more apparent because of it, and then for you to try to mental gymnastics your way around that.
