>>4170923After 17 years, yeah, I'm too smart for /p/. I can spot the retards who will never concede a single point from a mile away. You might be one of them.
I could go on about how including contemporary signifiers in your photography like cars, televisions, telephones, etc are important as a function of document, and how it was the pillar of Stephen Shore's and William Eggleston's work, but you're too stupid to get that.
I could point out that op is just a fake and gay faux nostalgist who doesn't realize that his very futuristic and novel present will become an ancient relic way faster than he's ready for it, but he's too stupid to get that too. He's a retarded zoomer. He thinks he invented literally everything, when literally nothing new has come out of that trite demographic.
Nothing is worth anything. This argument has been had a million times over on this board. We're way past the point of intelligent discourse, so these days I amuse myself by pointing out the fucking retards. Any questions?
