>>4215637>X100Not a rangefinder. People simply... do not want it to be a rangefinder.
>XproNot a rangefinder.
>Film M body pricesExtremely low supply, even lower supply of repair people, so even low demand can drive shit up.
>ZFCThis is an SLR styled MILC.
>PixiiDead for ages.
>A7CEVF, not ORF and so on and so on
There is no mass market demand for ORF cameras. People simply do not want them. You are a minority within a minority clamoring for an increasingly limited supply of rusty 1950s photography artifacts and funneling them towards a half dozen repair people.
The other 99.999999999% of the market just wants EVFs.
There is a very good reason every chinese company makes an M mount adapter, not an M mount camera. Nobody would buy them!
>>4215639It takes $50 and a CNC machine, but nobody fucking wants a leica. You are a standout, a weirdo, like someone that thinks a fixed gear bicycle has its merits. Most people look at a rangefinder, say
>cant see through the lens>no zooms>nothing wider than 28>nothing longer than 85-100>no polarizer>shit cameraAnd buy an MILC/SLR. Rangefinders suck.
If it was so desirable for the experience people would be clamoring for the other shitty rangefinders like the agfa super silette but they aren't, they are more in it for the leica and zeiss names and the history attached because they are equipment nerds first and photographers second to third.
