picrel is angled badly, it's truly a shame
>>4225538>How could I have done this better? I honestly do not have the answer to this question, i would have to be there. perhaps there was no way, the nature of the picture doesn't reveal much about anything around it (not to say this is necessary, either). I think "if you can get closer, it isn't a good photo" is retarded to the highest degree, pick your distance wisely and intentionally. sometimes you don't choose your distance, and sometimes that ruins your chances of capturing a certain subject.
>Going off this, I tried to do something like this with i think my problem with both of those is that the lines aren't going anywhere, there's no symmetry or direction. I think the former, the one i directly replied to, could have been perhaps a head-on view if that were at all possible, but again it's all trial and error. and I get it, sometimes you can't get further away>Shit? Ideas?i'm gonna be honest with you, I don't think anyone will buy them. they're kind of just snapshits.
I hope someone else steps in to offer critique though, as you can tell from my photos I'm no professional. I think you need to keep shooting, shoot extensively until you can show a pic to a friend and get a strong reaction. Don't rely on 4chan solely, you're not selling to 4channers
your photos just aren't doing anything for me, besides the freezing colors which i happen to actually like.
if you're gonna print any, print this guy
>>4224969and if you live in this city or near it, consider going back out, and trying to retake shots like this one
>>4224964but at least make the lines vertical or something, give it some symmetry or direction
