/p/ - Photography » Thread #4225661

[57 / 4 / 20]

53KiB, 500x500, s-l1200[1].jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 04 Sep 2023 23:48:29 No.4225661 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4225663 >>4225668 >>4225671 >>4225788

You will never become efficient enough until you'd get z5/a7iii/r6 tier camera

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20230904_165120_Gallery.jpg, 814KiB, 1566x1079

Anonymous Mon 04 Sep 2023 23:51:38 No.4225663 Report

Quoted By: >>4225671

>>4225661
efficient enough for...?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 00:01:58 No.4225668 Report

Quoted By: >>4225671 >>4225776

>>4225661
Why all the low megapixel scameras

40+. Sampling frequency matters more than your gay autofocus or 4k because you can’t outskill the reality of exactly how digital sucks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 00:09:15 No.4225671 Report

Quoted By: >>4225705

>>4225661
>>4225663
>>4225668
My Praktica Bx20 still works, so no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 02:45:27 No.4225705 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225671
>commie meme junk
Too cool for a kodak brownie huh gearfag

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 03:04:22 No.4225709 Report

Quoted By:

I skipped those mid tier bodies

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 10:37:09 No.4225776 Report

Quoted By: >>4225780 >>4225784

>>4225668
>muh digital sucks
20-24mp mogs 645 and 42-61mp FF beats 6x9 drum scanned.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 10:45:13 No.4225780 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225776
Not in SOVLness tho

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 10:54:43 No.4225784 Report

Quoted By: >>4225789 >>4225808 >>4225886

>>4225776
Digicucks be like let's take the most sharp image possible that clearly show tardigrades and parameciums so we can spend hours deleting that ugly sharpness via frequency separation in photoshop

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Photo kit 2023.jpg, 293KiB, 2116x1536

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 11:20:09 No.4225788 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225661
I considered the R6 as my first MILCS but realised I probably want a good cera instead.

studiomanagerfag

studiomanagerfag Tue 05 Sep 2023 11:46:30 No.4225789 Report

Quoted By: >>4225806 >>4225807

>>4225784
filmcucks use a dead, incomplete process that ends in digital reproduction.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 12:50:29 No.4225806 Report

Quoted By: >>4225809

>>4225789
>that ends in digital reproduction.
Just for advertisements of prints, not as a final product. The final product is analog

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 12:51:30 No.4225807 Report

Quoted By: >>4225867

>>4225789
This zoomer never heard of enlargers kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 12:51:53 No.4225808 Report

Quoted By: >>4225812

>>4225784
>"sharpness is ugly"
>t. Film Cope

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 12:51:58 No.4225809 Report

Quoted By: >>4225811 >>4225816

>>4225806
The final product is digital
It's what is sold and it's what is used

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 12:54:48 No.4225811 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225809
Damn bro you bought those NFTs?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 12:58:18 No.4225812 Report

Quoted By: >>4225818 >>4225819 >>4225854

>>4225808
Why is removing excessive details the essential part of high mp digicuck portrait photography if it isn't. It's unnatural and jarring to see every pimple, hair and pore. Filmchads perfected the medium a long time ago

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 13:00:44 No.4225816 Report

Quoted By: >>4225840

>>4225809
Protographs are made to be printed

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 13:11:21 No.4225818 Report

Quoted By: >>4225854

>>4225812
This but unironically? Digital portraits are very jarring to me for this reason, I think film renders faces much more pleasingly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 13:11:22 No.4225819 Report

Quoted By: >>4225830 >>4225913

>>4225812
>Why is removing excessive details the essential part of high mp digicuck portrait photography
Who the fuck told you this? I've never removed details from any high MP shot. Maybe a portrait photographer shooting old people and trying to hide wrinkles and skin cancer does this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:18:47 No.4225830 Report

Quoted By: >>4225833 >>4225835 >>4225906 >>4225950

>>4225819
You gain nothing from lying on the internet. Even a 12 year old girl will have nasty details when zoomed in

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:28:35 No.4225833 Report

Quoted By: >>4225838

>>4225830
That sounded kinda sus ngl

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:32:02 No.4225835 Report

Quoted By: >>4225838

>>4225830
what did bro mean by this

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:36:57 No.4225838 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225833
>>4225835
Not everything is sexual, freaks

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:37:21 No.4225840 Report

Quoted By: >>4225842

>>4225816
The vast majority of photographs are shot for, sold for and displayed in LED screens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:41:44 No.4225842 Report

Quoted By: >>4225845

>>4225840
Would you call every mp4 file a movie? I don't give a fuck where laypeople watch their snapshits

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:46:25 No.4225845 Report

Quoted By: >>4225846 >>4225853

>>4225842
How many photos have been sold for ads to show on the internet?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:47:14 No.4225846 Report

Quoted By: >>4225848

>>4225845
Sure go do stock photography imbecile

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:51:18 No.4225848 Report

Quoted By: >>4225850

>>4225846
>ads only use stock footage/photos
Why are you trying to talk shit about stuff you don't understand?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 14:54:11 No.4225850 Report

Quoted By: >>4225884

>>4225848
Sorry for not understanding your commercial kitsch you're an expert in that

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:01:08 No.4225853 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225845
>photos have been sold for ads
If the primary goal of the photo is not the photo itself but selling some goyslop it can't be as good. Simple fact

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:05:00 No.4225854 Report

Quoted By: >>4225855 >>4225858

>>4225812
It isn’t. Stop photoshopping ugly people. Unedited digital looks like people actually do, down to the blue patches of skin.

>>4225818
Kodak used to formulate film based on a photo of a white woman named shirley. It’s an edit in a can literally designed to obliterate pores and uneven tones in caucasoid skin. When people pursue this on digital, you retards say “LOOK FABSIOM EDITORIAL SHOT ON FLIM!!!!!”

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:08:54 No.4225855 Report

Quoted By: >>4225857 >>4225859

>>4225854
>Unedited digital looks like people actually do,
Digicuck sharpness makes women portraits look unflattering. You just don't have the eye to see it, blind digicuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:09:13 No.4225856 Report

Quoted By:

6x7 and larger looks like heavily edited digital

Only smaller formats look like film.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:10:27 No.4225857 Report

Quoted By: >>4225860

>>4225855
Woman are that ugly in real life. You’re just drunk and horny so you don’t remember and go back to clenching your teeth and banging on the keyboard because you finally remembered you spend $600 on film for 7 keepers a roll.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:10:44 No.4225858 Report

Quoted By: >>4225861

>>4225854
>When people pursue this on digital,
And they always do unless they want to get sued by the model kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:11:42 No.4225859 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225855
you are too used to makeup slathered plastic surgery asians or just literally blind and never saw the details before because you never got close enough to a womans face to

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:12:25 No.4225860 Report

Quoted By: >>4225863

>>4225857
>Woman are that ugly in real life
Do you want every ugly detail to be accented in your photos? I don't. I see no need for it most of the time

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:12:43 No.4225861 Report

Quoted By: >>4225864

>>4225858
Alright you’re a retard. Bye, filmcuck. Don’t forget to shoot another roll so you might get another 7 keepers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:15:04 No.4225863 Report

Quoted By: >>4225866

>>4225860
Yes.

Ugly people shouldn’t look pretty in photographs. If you realize you are hideous you can pay extra for the makeup artists services.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:16:41 No.4225864 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225861
Buttblasted digicuck zoomer probably never saw photo paper in his life. Are you the same guy who doesn't know what an enlarger is? I'm sure somebody explained it on tik tok

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:20:14 No.4225866 Report

Quoted By: >>4225869

>>4225863
Every single person has imperfections, virgin digicuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:20:48 No.4225867 Report

Quoted By: >>4225868

>>4225807
That's still incomplete

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:23:31 No.4225868 Report

Quoted By: >>4225905

>>4225867
You know things can and do exist even if you don't upload them to instagram?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:27:41 No.4225869 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225866
That’s why you pay extra for the makeup artist.

You would look just as ugly on 4x5 btw.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 71FC58EC-4DD7-4FDF-93BD-CA75B7BB (...).gif, 94KiB, 498x468

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:31:31 No.4225870 Report

Quoted By:

>DigiKEK! DigiKEK!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:34:24 No.4225873 Report

Quoted By:

arby's tier thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 15:40:45 No.4225875 Report

Quoted By:

>filmcel pretending that airbrushed portrait photography is the only thing that matters

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 16:17:54 No.4225884 Report

Quoted By: >>4225897

>>4225850
>butthurt remarks
>>4225850
>buzzwords of cope
Zero arguments present

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 16:19:11 No.4225886 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225784
It all depends on the lens, not the amount of megapixels. Good lenses don’t look oversharpened.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 16:45:50 No.4225897 Report

Quoted By: >>4225901

>>4225884
You're the one coping with buying wifi module on your camera for the price of a whole lens digicuck. Get scammed

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 16:58:00 No.4225901 Report

Quoted By: >>4225902

>>4225897
Holy chud tantrum. He’s resorted to schizobabble.

Teeth status: clenched
Edge of seat: sat on
Typing: loud
Shower: skipped (day 3)
Tendies: mom said later

Yep it’s a mad homo on 4chan

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 16:58:55 No.4225902 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225901
>Tendies: mom said later
Exposed yourself as a zoomer again

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 17:02:18 No.4225905 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225868
No, I haven't seen them. Do they really exist? Link?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 17:02:25 No.4225906 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225830
>can't shoot high MP because his glamour shots of little girls aren't smooth enough
Holy shit, do we need to report this to someone???

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 17:20:49 No.4225913 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225819
Show us your portraits

Ezra Bergstein

Ezra Bergstein Tue 05 Sep 2023 18:37:02 No.4225950 Report

Quoted By:

>>4225830
>the most perfect, alluring female in her prime gets less attractive the closer you get to her small body
Lies.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches