>>4232543Mirrorless AF tracking is at another level. The problem is that the better DSLRs already had great tracking and could reliably nail the shot. Mirrorless AF has more of a practical impact on video. For stills it's neat to see in action, but it doesn't practically change the result except in the most contrived scenarios (i.e. feeding a child Red Bull then trying to photograph them running around with an 85 f/1.2 while consistently AF locking their right eye). And, it is something that was "held back" from DSLRs. Just use an imaging sensor as the AE meter in a DSLR and you can AI track subjects, which a few late Canon DSLRs do. They're not as impressive in terms of subject recognition and stickiness as today's mirrorless, but they could be.
EVF exposure preview is a very intuitive way to work. I have to admit that. It's nice to see live exposure and have three dials (shutter, aperture, ISO) at your finger tips. That is mirrorless unique. You can accomplish the same in tricky lighting by mastering your DSLR spot meter, but EVF preview is just intuitive. That said, I still prefer looking through a good OVF.
Most mirrorless EVFs suck ass in low light. But I must admit that the best low light bodies (i.e. R6, A7s III) let you compose night shots in situations where you can't see shit in a DSLR.
Mirrorless can now shoot at fps speeds no DSLR can touch. You just can't flip the mirror that fast. I'm not sure how much that matters practically though.
tl;dr - if you're on a budget you can accomplish all your photographic goals with a DSLR, and at much lower cost and/or higher IQ for your budget.
