>>4232479>equivalent aperture and focal lengthbut using equivalent aperture and focal length would entirely defeat the point
the point of using a smaller sensor is that it, at the same fov, it would allow the use of a shorter (as in, of lower focal length) lens, which would give you a deeper dof at the same aperture and at the equivalent aperture
>it usesso you knew already and you just made a spam thread?
spamming is a bannable offense, you should know that anon
or are you making that up maybe?
>55mm f/2.8 has infinite dof from 3mit doesn't, on a 44x33mm """MF""" the hyperfocal near limit is around 14m, where in the world did you get the 3m figure from?
>it's most likely these were shot wide openI get the impression that you think these are short exposures for whatever reason, but they're at least 2s long as you can see from the motion blur
there's no reason to shoot that wide
>m43 doesn't win on price>a 645z with a 55 f/2.8 is cheaper than a GH6 with a 25mm f/1.4this is not only besides the point, it's also comically wrong
>a 645z with a 55 f/2.8 is marginally heavier than a GH6 with a 25mm f/1.4you must be kidding at this point
