[37 / 2 / 16]
The mods have done it again. They've deleted my on-topic thread and left up the frogposting threads, so finally here's the answers, from top to bottom:
Anonymous
Your photos suck
Anonymous
Quoted By:
nobody gives a fuck
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4235408 Do you not see the irony of your filename lol
EVF blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235419 >You missed focus on the SKY. Multiple times. I didn't, there was CA both sides (green and magenta). When focusing planets you can nail focus by minimizing CA as I did.
>I don’t care how your 20 year old FF DSLR does i have an a7riv. lmao the ignorance of this sentence is stunning.
Anonymous
>>4235451 You don’t understand a thing. Don’t waste your time. Quit this desperate gearfag cope and go take photos. You are bad at nerding out over gear. Do not die not even being able to use it. Pathetic fuck.
EVF blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235457 Look dude at the level of magnification I was working with you see CA even at critical focus, this is well known. The use of a teleconverter further increases those flaws. I know it is in focus because I also know how it looks when out of focus. You simply don't see the rings when not focused well enough.
Anonymous
>>4235459 Tldr
No picture
Your photos bad. Post better.
EVF blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235460 >no picture Why would I bother posting any more of them? Maybe I should become a frogposter, those don't get jannied by the glowies
Anonymous
>>4235464 >only posts photos to pretend to have a girlfriend Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4235471 >I'm in my basement 24/7 watching anime to train me into becoming a tranny and am a fat slob as a result, how do other anons get girlfriends? Reeee EVF blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235471 Your inceldom is showing through your post. Getting a gf isn't hard, keeping her and helping her avoid the brainwashing is the hard part.
Anonymous
>>4235527 >here 24/7 >totally has a girlfriend EVF blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235561 >here 24/7 I'm not here 24/7, that's the thing
Anonymous
>>4235568 Get a job nophoto tranny
EVF blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235571 My job is being a purveyor of film photography gear aka fleecing hipsters
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4235574 >i live with my parents and make weed money by scamming poor eastern bloc babushkas out of their camera gear for $5 and selling it for $50 300 Blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235590 I wouldn't scam a babushka.
Machining is my main activity anyways and I don't live with my parents.
Anonymous
>>4235627 >he claims to be a machinist >he can't machine a photograph Anonymous
>>4235628 You can't trust anything he says. He's a pathological liar with nothing better to do than flood /p/ with nonsense every day. Why he chose /p/ is anyone's guess.
300 Blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235628 How would one "machine a photograph"? Do you do light painting with carbide sparks? I seriously don't follow.
>>4235661 Fuck you too, buddy.
Anonymous
>>4235670 I think it’s pretty sad you’re outdone by a stereotypical street larping fujislug that cant even expose and frame as well as garry winogrand (and that’s saying something) so you resort to doing worthless gear tests like
>canon 5d ii + 400mm + tc vs canon rebel t2i + 400mm + tc Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4235672 winogrand was the og “i shoot raw” guy
he used fixed settings and checked his development under a safelight until he had a usable negative on every frame. he supposedly cut rolls up mid development when some frames finished earlier than others.
300 Blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235672 What has he outdone me at? Did he manage to disprove that pixel density equals reach? My main interests posting on /p/ are of a scientific and technical nature. My mission is to crush the myths that love to take root on this board.
Anonymous
>>4235674 Pixel density doesn’t equal ARTISTICALLY USEFUL reach. Image quality is shit. Subpixel details are accompanied by subpixel aberrations. People are complaining about their lenses being soft or misaligned with a7r IVs because they are looking at a 100% crop which means they are looking at something between four thirds and 1”. It’s a useless thing to use for “reach” unless you just want to read a license plate or ID a plane regardless of how good it looks.
Surveillance applications belong on /k/, /g/, and /diy/. You’re autistic so you don’t understand that a photography board is about the art rather than anything with a camera so your nophoto spec sheet peeping isn’t welcome.
>the computer counts this many lines on the sensor diagonal when i shoot the ansi 42069 test chart Yes but your photos are uselessly shit
300 Blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235680 Technical quality doesn't equal artistic quality lol. No such thing as "subpixel details", those don't even get recorded because the pixel is the minimum unit you have. The entirety of your argument is sheepleslop.
Anonymous
>>4235680 >my favorite format is ARTISTIC. Anything smaller need not apply because of SUBPIXELS Stop larping as an artist, gearfag
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4235682 The tldr for you
Medium format looks better than fine grained 35mm because small details look blurry.
Seriously, snoys are already running into this issue where they even bitch about their gay master lenses, it’s the same meh digital looking IQ associated with point and shoots they went full frame for lmfao.
Anonymous
>>4235690 My favorite format is APS-C and the best posters on /p/ (fuji) agree
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4235702 >muh subpixel details >fuji apsc Can't tell if you're being ironic. Your full pixel details are not even that good. What subpixels
Anonymous
>>4235682 >my interest is scientific and technical >btw what does a RAW converter do again? As always, leave it to a tripfags to post the most misguided, stupidest post in any thread.
Anonymous
>>4235670 >see shitpost aimed at you >instantly get defensive Machine yourself a prefrontal cortex
300 Blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
>>4235734 >>btw what does a RAW converter do again? Who are you quoting?
>>4235736 kek'd
Anonymous
>>4235794 I was making fun of your post because it implies a complete lack of understanding of what RAW converters do.
I hope it's clear enough now.
300 Blackout !!5Dz+C7v45HK
Quoted By:
>>4235809 lmao and when did I ever say anything that could as much as imply I don't understand what a RAW converter does? Because that's not even a mischaracterization of any argument I've made in the past, it's just completely made up. By the way and if this is coming from where I think it is, Capture One doesn't completely get rid of Fuji slugs. Hell not even Fuji's built-in JPEG engine does.
