>>4247428>which would be better in almost every way>except the only way that matters to a sigma foveon buyerThe photos look entirely unique. It's worth acquiring in the same way that rare art is worth acquiring; practically not at all, but if you value its unique qualities then absolutely.
>t. actual ownerThese are SOOC colours?! in artificial light? Like it's just crazy how good photos look right out of this camera, as long as you shoot iso 100. And they are FLAWLESSLY sharp.
But the battery is bad, the interface is bad, the file handling is bad, the af is bad, the max resolution is only good, not amazing.
Would a full frame, ~50mp, interchangeable lens version of exactly this camera (ie real 4:4:4 foveon, garbage everything else) still be the only digital camera I'd ever need or want? Yes.
