>>4251284Much like when cinefag the dogfucker snoy shill had a meltdown over dpreview's lens and lightroom preset choices biasing them against sony, and we did not give a fuck, because even with his snowflake crapture one profiles his photos look like shit, we do not give a fuck about you (yes, we know that is you) also noticing that reviewers tend to fudge literally everything for everything at every step of the process. Because we don't give a fuck about camera reviewers. They are paid shills, like you. And your photos don't even exist.
We don't need reviewers to know basic facts, like so:
Micro four thirds is 4x noisier at every ISO because it shoots all video modes plus stills with a 2x crop.
Micro four thirds lenses are softer even at their sharpest compared to full frame glass
Sony lenses have the worst corner performance and worst color rendition in the industry
Sony can not shoot over 6fps without a $6000 body or compressed 12 bit raws
Sony vignettes on average 1 ev worse than everyone else and has sensors that are 1/2 ev worse in noise performance compared to canon
Nikon has the worst color science, the worst lens ecosystem, and the worst cameras and is rapidly losing market share to fuji of all brands
Canon owns over half the camera market because their cameras are just better. The 90d and R7 are the best enthusiast cameras. The R6II, R5, R5C, and R3 are the best professional cameras. There is not a lens on earth that does not have a better counterpart in EF+RF. This is a fact, it's not up for debate.
