>>4254227I don't really care about the speedbooster, I want something like how Z and F lenses work on both FX and DX systems but with MFT instead. APS-C historically was just a compromise until FF sensors were a thing, not a conscious decision. I like the versatility of MFT and FF together and think APS-C isn't going far enough.
>reasonably wellYeah, that's the catch. I want no compromises, native-feeling AF on both cameras. There's nothing technically that makes that impossible, it's just no brand decided to approach MFT like that (and MFT itself probably makes it hard).
>>4254222>nikon Z fcI can't speak for the other brands but I remember not bothering with this due to substandard (for Nikon) weather sealing, 20MP (I wanted equivalent reach to MFT at least) and some other things I'm forgetting. I have a hybrid Nikon and MFT system and miss choosing between APS-C and FF cameras with my DSLRs on Nikon.
