>>4256850Because micro four thirds thread really don't have any photos
They have gearfag posts that are so stupid they are provocative. Like people pixel peeping the dpreview scene, which is simultaneously an ISO invariance test because 1: dpreview normalizes exposure 2: panasonic, fuji, and OM system label ISO one stop off.
You ALSO shouldn't be using higher ISOs like this... because they are dominated by read noise. Equivalence is for the appearance of noise under normal conditions, shot noise dominance. The sensitivity of m43 doesn't actually change, cropping just makes noise more apparent, so equivalence is literally useless.
You don't even pixel peep the dpreview scene correctly. You're supposed to click "comp" so you don't make the mistake of zooming in on the noise more on one camera. You're also supposed to turn off scaling in your OS because retina display users are looking at an upscaled image. And then, you make the mistake of comparing cameras that are not anywhere close to equivalent. I dont think anyone is buying a 62mp sony for low light because some SNR charter said pixel size doesn't affect noise (it does, it affects the appearance of the noise even though it doesn't affect the overall SNR).
If this could be mistaken for a photo thread, rather than an arguing about charts thread, then people wouldn't come in to argue about charts.
But you don't post photos here. You post 4 flower shits and start arguing against reality. Micro four thirds is a more limiting system because those limitations and their massive IQ hit also enable you to make cheaper lenses and get faster readout speeds. 'Ats it.
This is, again, not a photo thread.
This is a clueless gearfags arguing themselves into imaginary corners thread. It's like watching mimes. Or people debating atheist morality, arguing based on nothing, fallacies, and totally made up shit.
