>>4255801stop posting photos alone for critique. Unless you staged it and/or put extensive work into it so that it is exactly what it is, this doesn't make sense. There is nothing to critique about this underexposed crowd devoid of subject. I can see nothing special about it. Choose a theme and make series, that is how you make photos meaningful. And then one day maybe you'll be able to make one photos masterpieces, but before that, don't expect people to understand what you saw in one messy snapshit. I'm not saying all that to dunk on you specifically; this is just how it works. Even pros almost always group their photos by theme in book / expositions.
