>>4261857Technically (re semi-broken camera) they seem ok, I like the tonality and contrast in most of them.
Content-wise, a very mixed bag, the line that separates a decent photo from a snapshit is often very thin and only requires moving a few steps in one direction or other, or waiting a few seconds (or being a few seconds faster, typically). But photography is a constant learning process in being able to recognize those differences in advance, so keep trying, this is not a bad first roll.
>1Meh, bland, tree branch adds nothing and is unbalanced
>2Had potential, reframe to get rid of out of focus fence on the bottom, and the tall mast too
>3Too cluttered, there probably was a better angle there.
>4Not bad, could work especially well in context of other documentary shots from the area. Personally I'd move the eye level down a bit.
>5I see what you're trying to do here, but not being dead center (and ideally shot with tilt lens to avoid converging lines), it's just a cliche snap.
>6It didn't work, but it was worth trying, tilted horizon is tricky to get right, but you won't get it without practice.
Sorry, don't have time to do others, also this is just my opinions. My favorite is the wooden path/pier with a gate at the end and motorboats parked on both sides (no.13 if I count right?); I'd straighten the horizon (big pet peeve) and work on contrast a little, but it's pretty great otherwise. Good luck!
