>>4258365just ignore that.
/p/ has been plagued by some shills recently.
one recommends high end lumix micro four thirds cameras exclusively and makes up bogus scenarios to try and pretend they are "better than full faggots". he's totally full of shit, they're pretty good video cameras because nobody really stares at individual frames to take in the scenery, and panas do pretty sweet slomo, but stills can fall apart very quick at larger print sizes, deeper crops, and in dimmer light when super slow shutter speeds are not an option and deep focus is pretty pointless because the background is too dark anyways. when someone comes at you saying gh5 gh6 g9 g9ii, ignore him, those are fairly specialized cameras.
the other only recommends top shelf canon mirrorless gear. canon mirrorless has a situation with their lenses right now where everything cheap is a bit shit (isn't weather sealed even though the cameras are) and everything good is a bit expensive ($2000 lenses lol). he knows this, so he recommends adapting EF lenses, but they aren't getting any younger. he likes to lie about as much as the panasonic shill. he says canon has the best everything and the panasonic shill follows him around posting evidence to the contrary. conversely, he stalks the board to find the panasonic shill and disprove his claims.
you absolutely do not need an r6/r6ii/r5 for concert photography. these are pretty specialized machines for PROFESSIONAL sports photography (as in, if you didn't get THE moment the ball hit the bat you are fucking fired photography) and ultra low light video that pros have a chance at cleaning up. you're just a beginner you do not need this $3000 40fps CF card stuffing noise optimization shit. you don't even know what you're doing with photography period you're asking /p/.
buy a used FF DSLR (6dii, 5div, d750, d810, it really doesn't fucking matter) and f1.8 fixed lenses or f2.8 zooms. use that for at least six months and ask again - yourself, this time.
