>>4258430You're a person who doesn't understand cars or cameras or both
>canon=toyotanever the wrong choice, absolute beige reliability, the massively powerful laser focus of a japanese globocorp brought to bear on grinding riskless victory
>nikon=gmwe are incumbent in the us marketplace and technical competitiveness is secondary to maintaining market share
>sony=vw/mb/bmwmqb7 mqb7r mqb7s mbq7ii mq7rii mqb7sii mqb7c mqb7cr mqb7cii a6000 b6100 cla6300 gla6400 blb6500 eqb6700 why would you want to own one of these long enough to need new firmware/camchain tensioner anyway bro the absolute proliferation of turkroach shops selling chinese parts for these is a feature, not a symptom of their inadequacy...
>fuji=porscheso what if we make all our money selling apsc v6 suvs with the same parts that are way cheaper at vwsony, we make this one flagship model line that would be absolutely great if you could afford it
>olympus=subaruwe simply keep making the exact same model over and over again, we literally change nothing but the name, and its continued adequacy for the mediocre requirements of our customer base, and the fact that no competitors have chased us down this evolutionary deadend keeps us in business
>pansonic=teslawhy does "cutting edge tech" always feel like value stripped onions dystopia
>sigma=fiskerwut
>leica=paganii don't *need* to beat you at anything, peasant
>hasselblad=lamborghinimuh dik
>phase one=ferrariit's actually the one you buy when performance matters and cost is no object
