>>4271728>If gay, there is something wrongThere isn't. Because bro, if darwin decides right and wrong, murder and rape are okay if you don't get caught and therefore it benefits your genes by spreading them and killing off competition, so find a new framework for your morals.
Hell, with the aid of our friend darwin, you can justify almost anything. Masturbation? Merely sperm freshening. Bisexuals? Social bonding, hierarchy establishment based on mating prowess, and sexual practice. Bestiality? Practice mating and animal taming, hassan has the most obedient goats in all of pakistan. Pedophilia? Increasing the number of offspring you can have and conditioning a woman to be a more loyal mate by mating her before she develops independence. Assault and battery? Dominance to ensure the strongest male gets the most mates and resources. Theft? Wealth trickles up from the weak and ignorant to the strong and cunning so their genes will be more successful. There are lots of primitive third world communities that believe at some of this, sometimes all of this, and it seems to work for them - except for the part where they don't have much of a civilization. Yes! But there are also BILLIONS of these fuckers with no civilization, and always have been. Darwin would call that a massive success. So please avoid ever, ever basing your morals on simple darwinism. It describes how animals do proliferate, not how humans ought to reach great heights.
In the west, we don't mind homosexuals with conditions because their lives can be almost pure labor without any of the neuroticism associated with unmated humans of either gender. Since homosexuals are more likely to be the third son or third daughter of a larger family, or just the offspring of a weak (testosterone insensitive/deficient) man, they were never a darwin issue.. but now we understand hygiene and they really need to wear condoms.
Just treat them well, or they develop neuroticism anyways, as all groups subject to bigotry do.
