>>4268983Not with that. Scanners may gibs you an image but sir, sir, excuse me SIR, ur image is a bucketload of flimsy crapola.
Any decent camera sensor is far more sensitive than any of those scanners. Plustek is better than most but tries by scanning a magnified enlargement that comes at considerable cost to color depth. The best scanners to date are the Nikon and Hasselblad, both of which were discontinued a decade or more ago, and both of which get absolutely wrecked upside the head when compared to the sensor in a modern miroirirorless camera. Especially if you get one that does pixel shift, which makes up for the Bayer filter, digital cameras dirty little secret. Taking a single exposure, ea of your digital sensors pixels only captures an R, G or B level reading, and makes the other 2/3 of the color levels up by the Al Gore Rhythms. MF Al Gore dancing like a bitch up in here. Film on the other hand, captures all the lights color info in an instant. Ideally you take that capture (film) preserving the entire image, and THEN shove it in your digital cameras hungry hungry cakehole and shoot it to death, bracketing, HDRing, PixelShifting, analyzing your way to a new you, & aligning all those frames together to form a full color depth, high resolution file. Get the best of both whirleds.
Hey you asked.
