>>4270083>Photograph is voyeuristicNo, it actually isn't.
>the practice of gaining sexual pleasure from watching others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity.>There are two ways to define voyeurism: as a behaviour and as a sexual disorder. In general terms, a voyeur is "a person who derives sexual gratification from the covert observation of others as they undress or engage in sexual activities" (Canadian Oxford Dictionary). In this context, the behaviour is concerned with three things: the surreptitious nature of the observations; the private and intimate nature of what is observed; and sexual gratification>Voyeurism is the sexual interest in or practice of watching other people engaged in intimate behaviors, such as undressing, sexual activity, or other actions of a private natureYou see, if I'm a journalist and take a photo in public of public activity, than is journalistic, not voyeuristic. If I am partying and take a photo of my friend brad teaching his girl stacy to play pickleball that's not voyeurism unless I'm zooming in on stacy's tits or zooming in on a female cops ass instead of capturing the scene.
Now eggy's "work" is strongly voyeuristic assuming an arrest of sexual development that leaves him gaining strong gratification from clothed women doing nothing (actually common). He has a strong focus on scantily clad women wearing erotic clothing with tightly wrapped tits, deep cleavage, and often visible nipples. Unless he's a diagnosed asexual or homosexual I have a hard time trusting that man.
In advance, please spare us the sontag. That dried up schizoid cunt has never been an intellectual. The average 4chan shitposter is more intelligent and insightful. Sontag is often unknowingly reproduced by totally uneducated 30 year old lefyright boomers from arkansas shitposting on /pol/. That is like monkeys accidentally paraphrasing immanuel kant - not an accomplishment by the monkeys, but shade cast upon kant.
