>>4270891This.
>>4270895>Because of laymen like this >>4270891 spouting this exact same myth because way back when, their dad said "anyone workin in the arts uses a mac" Nice try, but the reason for working on Macs today is because Windows really has become dog shit. Slow, bloated, insecure, shiity UI with 20 confusing and slightly incompatible ways to do each thing, and the pajeets at Microsoft now spy on you more than spyware creators. What's really sad and ironic is that Windows runs better in a VM on Intel Macs than it ever does on its own. (Not sure about the ARM version, but I suspect it's the same with an ARM build of Windows.) Which means even if you want to use Windows, you're better off on a Mac. And the best part about Windows on a VM on top of macOS? When (not if) Microsoft itself or some malware shit blows out your entire install, you can simply roll back to the last good version.
Windows 2000 and XP were decent, and Windows 7 was peak Windows. Which is why there was such an outcry when Steam decided to drop support for Windows 7. It has all been downhill since then.
>I usually see windows, because it gets the best support firstIf by "best support" you mean "GBs of jeet code that take hours to install and add more bugs and security holes to your system." And yes, I know Apple is flooded with jeets as well, which accounts for them getting worse in some ways since Jobs died. But it's still night and day versus SaaS Winjeet 11.
>If you decide to actually do some research and stop being a layman (and I mean research, not into marketing material) you will find macs generally underperform Spoken by someone who has never done research or even touched a Mac.
>t. Owns two high end MacBooks, a Windows notebook, and a high end Windows gaming tower that also dual boots HackintoshBasically if it's not a game or a project which requires direct access to 'the metal' in Windows, I run it in a Windows VM on a Mac.
