>>4272551>DepartureMoulded ultra-extreme-asphericals were already a thing in phone lenses
>>4272525Nikon did a similar lens with slightly jankier AF but also, weather sealing. The canon lens is sharper in the corners with worse CA control, the nikon lens is softer in the corners with fewer weird colors. Both vignette about 3ev wide open. They are tempting to look at, but I don't want to shoot with that shit after using an OM ZUIKO 28mm f2.8 that vignetted so hard I couldn't see the fucking light meter in the OVF, and a sony 20mm that was so dark wide open 2/3s of the image looked like micro four thirds if you corrected it.
>inb4 some retard thinks a 26mm f2.8 obliterates the background into color soupThe Z 40mm is more tempting for the punchier and smoother look that classic optical formula gives photos. Too bad the build quality is below canon tier and plastic mounts can theoretically damage your camera over time. If nikon releases a S version that doesn't touch the optics (a tall order these days, when MTF charts rule unless your name is leica) and just gives it actual weather sealing and a fluorine coating I'm buying that shit after gearfags buy it, and then sell it when they realize that when they put a test chart 3 feet away and shoot it wide open, it's "soft" (operator error, lenses have field curvature and varying sharpness through the focus range lol)
>inb4 voigtWhere's the weather sealing on those? I don't want lens fungus because it snowed, thanks.
