>>4272433>Put 25mm olympus 1.8 on om-5, and it's the lightest 50mm system you can possibly buy.Who the hell cares about a few grams enough to shoot a 50mm f3.6 with 4x more noise?
https://pxlmag.com/db/camera-size-comparison/0032805d_8137dd9e-feb6b053_eb930f80-0032805d_7869c6b6-t60Left: not fully weather sealed, 550g - 50mm f3.6, 4x more noise at every ISO despite no exposure difference
Middle: Fully weather sealed (first generation sony actually did it), 683g, superior ful lframe performance
Right: Fully weather sealed, 824g - 50mm f2.4, 4x more noise at every ISO
133g = 0.29lb. Unnoticeable.
OM-5: $850 used avg, A7C: $1000 used avg, $150, literally 3 hours overtime at work for someone who isn't a total failure
Super slow, super soft olympus lens without weather sealing: $200 avg
Slightly slow, super sharp sony lens WITH weather sealing, declickable aperture, custom button, and af/mf switch: $550 avg
Slightly slow, sorta sharp olympus lens with weather sealing and custom button only: $550 avg (almost 50% depreciation from the new price, wonder why)
Total sony victory over m43: pro larp edition. Not a high standard to meet.
>rage syndrome against m43m43 is fine but trying to shill people on its most pointless iteration? really? who the hell would pay almost as much for 0.29lbs of weight savings at the cost of a shitton of IQ? why not just get a 1" PNS at that point since the 25mm f1.8 is not even weather sealed? m43 is good at some things. super cheap bodies with super cheap, super slow zoom lenses that have no aps-c or full frame equivalents. higher end video specs where the IQ hit doesn't matter because video IQ doesn't matter. but what you're comparing here is not its strong suit.
>>4272404Absolutely no canon RF lenses without the L designation have weather sealing. It's the norm, not the exception.
