>>4277515>Printing huge sheetsYes
>AND selling themWhy can't you imagine dong something for yourself or your friends? Do you have a mental breakdown when you imagine how much work you'd have to do with your om5 to pay it off? Also, what about cropping? Full frame excels at being 2-3 cameras at one, with just one lens. Micro four thirds does not have lenses like a 50mm-100mm f1.8-3.6. m43 image quality cant tolerate crops, its iphone tier.
Maybe your post should have been ignored from the start when it opened with "FOOL FRAMERS" because you are some schizo. How's this explanation:
Most micro four thirds shooters are manchildren who live with their parents and take meaningless snapshots of nothing as they collect gear, like this
>>4277494 >>4277493The average full frame shooter is not even on /p/, this board with 200 people tops, because with the money needed to afford a good FF normally comes with:
A family (you cant post photos of them here)
A life (you cant post photos of anything too identifying here, this is literally classified as a child porn website)
A job (you can't spend your free time here, daily, wasting your photos on snapshots of nothing just so you can say "im not nophoto today")
>>4277519You just proved him right. It's irrational to hate fuji. Muh worms. Muh wax. Muh muh muh. Fuji general has the best dcoumentary photography and a lot of professional medium format/full frame shooters have a small fuji in their bag for when photography is a secondary activity.
>>4277520Right now, fuji does EVERYTHING better than every micro four thirds camera except for the DSLR-sized $2000 G9II, ultra-long slow aperture zoom lenses, and shooting 4k120 and some codecs but I cant imagine caring about codecs when most cinema cameras for jobs where codecs matter are rented and have global shutter aps-c sensors. And if its not a job, codecs dont matter, because Im having a hard time believing gearfags have silver screens at home to "print" their movies.
