>>4279012This photo is so autistically composed i'd think it was german, not jewish, and there is no content of note. Is your shining example of "content is king" the goyim's obsession with celebrity? pretty sad then, i declare photography dead in advance.
If you want a real example of content over carefulness, check out another jew, garry winogrand. He was so averse to the technical aspects of camera operations that he shot his camera with fixed settings and used a combination of stand development and safelights to fix exposure, and would often crop his final prints. That would make him the first full fledged "i shoot raw" street photographer of note. All he ever considered while photographing is 1: thats cool! 2: is it mostly in the frame? 3: *snap*
He is, in other words, the best, and most intellectually and philosophically sincere photographer to ever live. Photography is neatly divided into pre-winogrand and post-winogrand. Even the biggest pseud snob who hates this man and his work has been inadvertently influenced by him. Cinema was influenced by him. Journalism was influenced by him. By just capturing interesting things happening in reality, he buck broke photography and pulled its head out of its asshole.
Yes, I admit, he would not be so famous if he were not a jew, and friends with rich jews, in order to kickstart his career which depended on being able to afford so much film that it would cost over two million in today's money. To that, I say, why havent you goyim figured out that helping each other ends in all of you being successful? Afraid it would be "racist" to give your distant brothers a leg up? Muh meritocracy? Measuring tapes for men? Lol. Because of jewish good will and our generosity towards our own, photography is actually good now instead of stodgy victorian era camera-obscura posed portraits and photos of fucking rocks.
