>>4284182>not weather sealed at all - COUNTLESS early sony lenses werent>one of the few lenses that is visibly soft, basically a 1970s vivitar zoom>OSS didnt do shit>lenses came new in box with decentering issues bad enough to be seen in small printsIt was an awful lens. In fact every single sony/zeiss lens suffered from severe quality issues people stopped coping about in fucking 1980 because they mostly stopped existing. The x100v’s shitty built in lens was sharper than the average ZArbage.
Anti-gearfag gearfags will seethe but there is a such thing as an unusable lens.
>CONTENT OVER QUA-Quality is content if something is so blurry you cant tell bricks are bricks instead of a red blur.
>BUT MUH SOVL MUH PNS MUH STREET PHODOGRAFER “ARTIST”None of them were ever artists, for one, they were part of the modern “art” pump and dump/money laundering scam, and you should remember this lens sold for over a thousand bucks and was meant to go on a $3000 camera.
>OH SO UR POO-No, I shoot canon. Are you?
