>>4289376Holy consoom!
>it has to be a new nikon Z!!!!First off, no m43 lens is really pro, and m43 "flagships" are often still quite shit compared to FF (so many FPS, 10% AF hit rate, so fucking noisy, crispy shit iq...), so let's drop the standards for FF a bit instead of paying extra for a brutal mogging.
>Flagship body, weather sealedA7C, $1000-$1200 used
>Weather sealed macroSigma 105mm f2.8, $500 used
>weather sealed standard zoomTamron 28-75 f2.8 G2, $600 used
>Weather sealed primeTamron 388mm f2.8 di iii osd, $150 used
>weather sealed telephoto zoomSigma 100-400 f5-6.3. $600.
Total for a FF sony setup that stomps all over a memelympus and it's f5.6 equivalent lens: $3050. Bring on the FUD, lies, and irrational sony hate. For normal people who did not consoom every possible genre of photography the price differences can shrink significantly. For people skilled and manly enough to use a DSLR, $500 comes off the total at the mere cost of IBIS being a total loss, which for a great amount of photography, isn't really a big deal.
And where the fuck do you get 10k used for nikon anyways? What's worth using on F mount still works fine and beats out micro four thirds lenses any day.
I can put together even cheaper m43 kit, and did, but it just sucks compared to the most entry level full frame gear unless you exclusively shoot hovering hummingbirds.
