>>4287093Supposedly, the very early MIJ fujis without IS. And mirrorless will still run out of batteries faster.
>>4287097>"In 1975 I paid $295 for my black OM-1md with the G.Zuiko 50/1.4 and the leather case."Bro paid $2000 in todays money and still has a working camera
Meanwhile IBIS failures are already cropping up in early minolta/sony, pentax, and olympus cameras (IBIS is the sensor moving on top of bearings in tracks, as gunk gets to them it will underperform, anti-stabilize, and fail) and ribbon cables in random cameras with articulating screens are shitting themselves. have yo uused a camera that "does nothing"? You lose way less than you think.
>but electronics are unreliable!Minolta maxxum 7000s still work.
Go on, turn off all VR and keep your screen folded for a day, and just shoot remembering that indoor f1.4 1/20s of your sleeping cat is not a photo worth wasting a shutter actuation on - again.
You could theoretically keep your camera working for longer doing this, never using extending zooms ever, and not testing the "weather sealing" /p/ loves so much for their moss photos and street shooting without an uncool camera bag (its not about the photos its about feeling like you look cool i mean the aesthetic of the activity)
