>>4303975Film is different. Nolans films have a look, and part of that look is the way film looks. Digital also looks good, but it doesn't look like nolan.
Arguing film vs digital is like arguing strawberry vs raspberry, gearfag. Don't tell anyone, and don't let anyone tell you, that your photo is better or worse because of the gear, because the gear is just one of the many creative decisions that create the aesthetic.
It would be like telling me that my playing is better or worse because of my authentic Gibson Les Paul Standard 60s not being a PRS private stock or condor shitter. That's stupid, and you can hardly tell anyways, I just use it because I like it ya consoomer war SOI.
