/p/ - Photography » Thread #4298999

[25 / 1 / ?]

607KiB, 2000x1500, 1682448212323218.jpg

Sick of black mist

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 15:17:30 No.4298999 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4299001 >>4299022 >>4299116 >>4299218 >>4299566 >>4301336 >>4301419 >>4305987

My gf (female) was asking me about cameras and all the kpop videos and cute pics, I noticed they are just black mist. When will this trend die?

fe2fucker

fe2fucker Thu 28 Mar 2024 15:19:12 No.4299001 Report

Quoted By:

>>4298999
Idk i dont have the ability to predict the future
Could prolly make a lot of money if i did

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 16:19:43 No.4299020 Report

Quoted By: >>4299572

female or female (formerly male)?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 16:34:24 No.4299022 Report

Quoted By: >>4299027 >>4299081 >>4299086 >>4299216

>>4298999
It will continue to exist as long as people use digital cameras because no one prefers the look of digital to film and BPM helps remove some of the digital harshness. You should always be using it to make your photots look better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 17:28:23 No.4299027 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299022
I have some vintage lenses that don't require a pro-mist filter (no it's not fungus), but I also have a couple of modern zooms that I'll occasionally bust out the filter for. I won't go beyond 1/4, but even that's borderline sometimes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 21:28:40 No.4299081 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299022
Lol diffusion filters have been a thing forever, this isn't solely digital.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 21:48:43 No.4299086 Report

Quoted By: >>4299203 >>4299530

>>4299022
No one tell this zoomer that cinestill is not “the film look” i think its funny when they stay dumb

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Mar 2024 23:38:14 No.4299116 Report

Quoted By: >>4299186

>>4298999
All it did for that picture was make the light HUGE. lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Mar 2024 01:28:17 No.4299133 Report

Quoted By:

No filter looks way better

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Mar 2024 05:14:51 No.4299186 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299116
And added a big greasy lens flare to the right of the person's feet. My Chinesium 17mm does that for free!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Mar 2024 07:28:15 No.4299203 Report

Quoted By: >>4303364

>>4299086
He didn’t say anything about cinestill

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Mar 2024 09:48:34 No.4299216 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299022
Digital harshness is not a thing. you just like soft images. your opinion is retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Mar 2024 10:05:40 No.4299218 Report

Quoted By:

>>4298999
I really like it, and bought some expensive Tiffen ones for my primes. Now I like to snap some pics in backlight.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Mar 2024 13:39:12 No.4299530 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299086
>akshally filmic is

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Mar 2024 16:19:26 No.4299566 Report

Quoted By: >>4301337

>>4298999
im sorry but the right image looks better and more alive
it is what it is...

cANON

cANON Sat 30 Mar 2024 16:32:40 No.4299572 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299020
female (currently male)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 05 Apr 2024 03:55:52 No.4301336 Report

Quoted By:

>>4298999
she will never be a woman, but will always be autism.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 05 Apr 2024 03:57:05 No.4301337 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299566
post hand

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 05 Apr 2024 16:11:28 No.4301419 Report

Quoted By:

>>4298999
>When will this trend die?
Basically never, same as bokeh, bitches love balls and glow

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 Apr 2024 10:36:28 No.4303364 Report

Quoted By:

>>4299203
cinestill look is when halation

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Apr 2024 22:07:53 No.4305867 Report

Quoted By: >>4305869

am i stupid or is it borderline indistinguishable when using a black mist filter? i shoot film and i havent developed any shots using it yet, but in the viewfinder shots look barely different with vs without. is it just in the viewfinder that it looks no different or is this a skill issue?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Apr 2024 22:17:56 No.4305869 Report

Quoted By: >>4305871

>>4305867
The point is you don't really notice it except in situations with point light sources or strong backlighting. It's meant to be borderline indistinguishable. Just a little light funky sauce ladled on top of your photo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Apr 2024 22:19:23 No.4305871 Report

Quoted By: >>4305934

>>4305869
yeah but when i test it out by pointing the cam at a street light or something i can only barely see a bigger cloud of light from it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Apr 2024 03:49:14 No.4305934 Report

Quoted By:

>>4305871
Correct. What do you want it to do? There are heavier diffusion filters out there. And heavier strengths of BPM. Get a star filter or faux anamorphic flare filter if you really want to see some shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Apr 2024 10:45:11 No.4305987 Report

Quoted By:

>>4298999
checked
Using BPM to bloom lights like OP's picrel is a crime.
I shoot jpeg sooc and BPM gives a nice touch when used properly: 1/8 with 85mm or more and 1/4 with 50mm or less.
>inb4 jpg retard
I shoot jpeg+raw for archiving purposes, but I dont bother to process my raws atm

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Sick of black mist