>>4301842back then, the dynamic range of these cameras was so shit people tried to squeeze some softness out of them by using diffusion filters, things like pro mist but like 2 of a max strength ones stacked in front of one another, that's almost certainly whats going on in
>>4301844tying into that is gamut, or rather the lack of it. add global contrast and then remove it with negative tonal contrast, the result is that the gamma remains the same but the colour information is shot to shit.
finally use a lens that's from the same era,
https://youtu.be/SB35WTlq1Sk?t=20 is what you get with an old broadcast style lens on a modern camera with modern colorimetry, shit up the colors and it's going to be fairly convincing, THEN add all the post effects like halation, interlacing, bleed, etc.
