>>4304195>for videoVideo doesn't really matter. People shot for the silver screen on 16mm film. Lower than megapixel war tier gearfaggotry. MUH 4:2:2 IS THE 4k DCI THO WHATS THE CROP IN 60P DOES THIS RECORD LONGGOP OR ALL-I - who the FUCK cares? Movies that made more than your entire family is worth were shot on equipment that made the 5diii look like a luxury product and you worry about this codec shit for what, youtube? I have seen video-brah camera reviews...zooming in on frozen footage...lmfao what the fuck. That's like pixel peeping 200% - on instax film.
>Better colorsSubjective, editible.
>The build isn't comparableNikons are well known for their durability and weather sealing. They fucked up a few times and issued recalls.
Panasonic is well known for port, shutter, mainboard, and IBIS failures on their micro four thirds cameras and battery drain on the S5s. No recalls yet. After all the busted GH5s I can't trust them.
>Gay ass cardsIts funny as fuck when someone can afford a $1000 camera but wants to use a UHS-1 SD card. Shit bro why didn't you just buy a DSLR or APS-C? It's a luxury product, and using faster cards is a luxury. You're in the wrong price bracket.
>Z mount lacks lensesIt has more, and better, lenses especially with adapters. Sigma, who needs sigma? Nikon can use first party sony lenses. But since you're poor you'll be glad to know the cheapo FTZ lets you use lenses that are like $150 instead of $500+ for the sparse selection of L mount shit.
>like way cheaper$850-$1000 for the old panasonic vs $850-$1000 for the old nikon
$1150-$1300 for the new nikon vs $1500+ for the new panasonic, purely becaue of the economies of scale, more people want nikon so nikon makes more cameras so the prices go lower
