After the 24-50 f2.8 confused professionals across the globe with its lack of reach and total unsuitability for sports and weddings, the only things that matter (just ask canon why they're #1, bitch) sony has released yet ANOTHER small zoom "uhhh because we have a small camera or two"
https://electronics.sony.com/imaging/lenses/all-e-mount/p/sel1625gWho the fuck is buying this shit? Who seriously wants slightly smaller cameras? Just buy APS-C, if your camera needs to be this small nobody gives a shit about your photography, no bride is asking you to zoom in on her face to look for zits. just shoot APS-C. STOP RUINING FULL FRAME WITH COMPACT GARBGE, FULL FRAME = PROFESSIONAL = HANDHOLD TRINTIY ZOOMS FOR 10 HOURS.
>b-b-b-b-but i like zooming inOk, here's my tip for you
Don't
You like nice cameras because you like to zoom in?
Stop fucking zooming in
Problem solved
Go back to fuji!
I don't care if you like to zoom in. The hobbyist "need" for full frame so they can "admire" "nicer pictures" is polluting what was once honest professional tools represented by the canon 1d and nikon d5 with tiny snapshitter junk. What is this, the 70s? Full frame was our 645 and now you are turning it into the new 35mm film! Fuck you!
I repeat, hobbyists - already ruined full frame! Sony almost completely died as a brand because they almost thought hobbyists size obsession was valid, and for four fucking generations sony MILCs were totally unusable to us actual professionals. YOU try shooting a 10+ hour wedding with adapted EF mount trinity zooms on a sony a7iii! Go on, do it! Sony had to bend over backwards to make the GM IIs usable on their legacy bodies and if you ask me, they should have been larger for ultimate sharpness! They made the bodies bigger, finally, and they are still too fucking small for a real professional.
And now Nikon and canon have "pancakess"? WASTE OF R&D.
I dont want to hear it, you handhold a 100-400 for a whole football game and then you can talk
