>>4388857>I can't believe how ridiculous the AF is on the D4 it will find shit in a completely pitch black room, it actually tracks moving stuff unlike the 800 and it's insanely fasThere is no meaningful difference in autofocus speed or accuracy. What makes you believe this?
>Low light performance is excellent.No, it isn't. Not on the D800 or the D4. Noise is very noticeable from ISO 800 and up.
>10 fps was niceSure. That is significantly faster than the D800's 4 FPS.
>I want the extra real estate for and the D4 for sports and shit that movesI mean, it's fast, but at 16MP...
What's even the point of an excellent lens like the 70-200mm VR2 on 16MP?
Also, if you're going for speed, the modern mirrorless systems are just ridiculously incomparable. Like 200 FPS incomparable.
I feel like the D4 (and D5, D6) filled a niche that simply doesn't exist anymore. There's no real reason to get one in this day and age.
