>>4419485it is not center weighted in the aperture priority mode, instead there's a scatterplot like reflector (picrel) that is read by two SBC cells to determine exposure, and if the exposure is longer than 1/60 they read the light directly from the film; in manual mode it is traditional center weighted through the viewfinder via two cds cells. aside from being neat I find that its quite accurate even for scenes like
>>4419462, though iirc I stopped down to 2.8 and added +1/3 exposure comp to make sure the lights weren't too blown out
>>4419481quite a nice shot. I'd like to shoot more b&w but to justify it I'd need to do home dev since the cheap lab near me only does c-41 and I guess i'm not quite there yet.
>>4419482very nice as well, though I can understand why the other one gets more attention. something about the way the sky gives the glowing, almost blown out look while still being blue I think. some kind of mist filter? I would love to put together some kind of photobook or magazine or something, but I'd like to have a good idea beyond "hey I have a lot of X type of photo, lemme snap some more to round them out" which is kind of where I'm at now. maybe I'm just overthinking it
