>>4425060>GH7>He already bought a $2000 slow motion camcorder, for photographyHoly gearfag. That's a 4k120-HD300fps video camera, it's not really meant for what you're doing.
>>4425068>I have the "Leica" (rebadged panasonic) 85mm f2.4 equivalent>$1297 newJesus fuck
>and the "leica" 100-400mm f5.6-8 equivalent>$1597 newJesus FUCK, almost $5000 for this?
The salesman scammed you hard. You overspent big time between snake oil and features you don't need. Panasonic bodies like this are for videographers because they shoot open gate (more resolution for anamorphic lenses), have a wide framerate range, and have decent codecs enabled out of the box, and the panasonic-"leica" lenses are kind of a marketing scam like gibson electric guitars and official porsche power steering fluid, but somehow sadder because panasonic really isn't a luxury brand with serious heritage, so it's like buying a "honda-porsche civic" with nicer seats and 20 more horses.
Return everything asap, you're not really getting anything you wouldn't with much cheaper gear and the bullshit premium pixel peeper stuff has crippled you for focal length.
Here is how you do micro four thirds gear. First, return everything. Now, look for mint copies of these:
E-M1 III
Lumix 100-300 mk II
Olympus 45mm f1.8
Subscribe to lightroom for the AI denoisier
If insistent on spending $5k, Z8+180-600+85mm f1.8 S (that's an f0.9 in four thirds land)
Everything else is skill issues. Bad light, crappy perspective, obstructions, center framed everything, etc.
